ATI LIQUIDATING, INC. AVZA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1311396Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jun 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Shaw PittmanFirst linked Jan 2007 · Text search only · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- COX CASTLE & NICHOLSONFirst linked Jun 2005 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jun 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Shaw Pittman | Jan 2007 | Text search only | 149 | 0.98 | 0.53 | 1.08 |
| COX CASTLE & NICHOLSON | Jun 2005 | Text search only | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.26 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John J. HuberLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 61 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.74×
- Andrew S. WilliamsonCooley LLPFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.70×
- Christopher L. KaufmanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Steven V. BernardWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John J. HuberLatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 61 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 1.74 |
| Andrew S. WilliamsonCooley LLP | Jun 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 1.70 |
| Christopher L. KaufmanLatham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 54 | 0.81 | 0.00 | 1.09 |
| Steven V. BernardWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jun 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 0.96 | 0.00 | 1.11 |