INTERMOLECULAR INC IMI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1311241Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2017
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Nixon PeabodyFirst linked Sep 2019 · Named in a filing · 196 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jul 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jul 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nixon Peabody | Sep 2019 | Named in a filing | 196 | 1.13 | 0.78 | 0.94 |
| Davis Polk | Jul 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jul 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jim MorroneLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Alan F. DenenbergDavis PolkFirst linked Sep 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 114 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Patrick A. PohlenLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jul 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 1.25× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Tad J. FreeseLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2016 · Text search only · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.80× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim MorroneLatham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.94 |
| Alan F. DenenbergDavis Polk | Sep 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 114 | 1.19 | 0.00 | 1.43 |
| Patrick A. PohlenLatham & Watkins LLP | Jul 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 43 | 1.20 | 1.25 | 0.98 |
| Tad J. FreeseLatham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2016 | Text search only | 58 | 0.63 | 0.80 | 1.55 |