TerraVia Holdings, Inc. TVIA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1311230Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Aug 2017
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Sep 2016 to Aug 2017
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Alston & BirdFirst linked May 2011 · Text search only · 583 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Barnes & ThornburgFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 167 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Kilpatrick TownsendFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Mar 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Mar 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Alston & Bird | May 2011 | Text search only | 583 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.79 |
| Covington & Burling | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.99 |
| Barnes & Thornburg | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 167 | 1.07 | 0.70 | 0.86 |
| Cooley LLP | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Goodwin Procter | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Kilpatrick Townsend | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 154 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 0.71 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alan F. DenenbergDavis PolkFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 114 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Allison B. SpinnerWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.99×
- Jeffrey D. SaperWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.83× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alan F. DenenbergDavis Polk | Mar 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 114 | 1.19 | 0.00 | 1.46 |
| Allison B. SpinnerWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Mar 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 1.30 | 0.00 | 1.99 |
| Jeffrey D. SaperWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Mar 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 102 | 1.24 | 0.83 | 1.51 |