QPC Lasers QPCI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1310753Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Oct 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in a filing · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Richardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in a filing · 215 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morrison & Foerster | Jun 2007 | Named in a filing | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| Richardson & Patel LLP | Sep 2006 | Named in a filing | 215 | 1.07 | 1.41 | 1.28 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Nimish PatelRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in a filing · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 1.05× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Wendy E. MillerFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in a filing · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 0.60×
- Jeffrey MallerFirst linked Dec 2006 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 2.55× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Erick RichardsonRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Sep 2006 · Text search only · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 1.64× · 95% wipeout 1.72×
- Michael DonahueRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Sep 2006 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.19× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimish PatelRichardson & Patel LLP | Sep 2006 | Named in a filing | 39 | 1.15 | 1.05 | 1.48 |
| Wendy E. Miller | Dec 2004 | Named in a filing | 28 | 0.00 | 1.33 | 0.60 |
| Jeffrey Maller | Dec 2006 | Text search only | 15 | 0.62 | 2.55 | 0.88 |
| Erick RichardsonRichardson & Patel LLP | Sep 2006 | Text search only | 44 | 1.68 | 1.64 | 1.72 |
| Michael DonahueRichardson & Patel LLP | Sep 2006 | Text search only | 7 | 0.00 | 2.19 | 1.08 |