K&F Industries Holdings, Inc. KFI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1310663Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked May 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Dewey BallantineFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 228 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.03× · Went dark 0.29× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Foster PepperFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 1.92×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Kramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | May 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Dewey Ballantine | May 2005 | Text search only | 228 | 2.03 | 0.29 | 0.87 |
| Foster Pepper | May 2005 | Text search only | 43 | 0.81 | 0.62 | 1.92 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | May 2005 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Kramer Levin Naftalis | May 2005 | Text search only | 304 | 0.95 | 0.68 | 1.16 |
| Paul Hastings | May 2005 | Text search only | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Shearman & Sterling | May 2005 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Willkie Farr | May 2005 | Text search only | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bruce D. MeyerGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked May 2005 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Timothy J. HartGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked May 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bruce D. MeyerGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | May 2005 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Timothy J. HartGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | May 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.03 |