TELIX QSAM INC. QSAM (last ticker on record)
CIK 1310527Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Nov 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dickinson WrightFirst linked Dec 2021 · Named in a filing · 104 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 1.73× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Gusrae Kaplan & BrunoFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 1.31× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Daniels Daniels & Verdonik, P.A.First linked Mar 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Akerman LLPFirst linked Dec 2021 · Text search only · 211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Dec 2021 · Text search only · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Feb 2014 · Text search only · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dickinson Wright | Dec 2021 | Named in a filing | 104 | 1.20 | 1.73 | 1.43 |
| Gusrae Kaplan & Bruno | Sep 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 76 | 0.60 | 1.31 | 0.89 |
| Daniels Daniels & Verdonik, P.A. | Mar 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 1.62 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Akerman LLP | Dec 2021 | Text search only | 211 | 1.09 | 0.67 | 1.36 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Dec 2021 | Text search only | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Feb 2014 | Text search only | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Lawrence G. NusbaumGusrae Kaplan & BrunoFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 1.57× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- James F. VerdonikDaniels Daniels & Verdonik, P.A.First linked Mar 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lawrence G. NusbaumGusrae Kaplan & Bruno | Sep 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 46 | 0.99 | 1.57 | 0.70 |
| James F. VerdonikDaniels Daniels & Verdonik, P.A. | Mar 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 1.10 | 0.88 | 0.00 |