Vyteris Holdings, Inc.
CIK 1308332Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Lowenstein SandlerFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in a filing · 297 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Littman KrooksFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.65× · 95% wipeout 2.07×
- Morse, Zelnick, Rose & Lander, LLPFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lowenstein Sandler | Nov 2004 | Named in a filing | 297 | 1.12 | 0.70 | 1.42 |
| K&L Gates | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Littman Krooks | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 32 | 0.88 | 0.65 | 2.07 |
| Morse, Zelnick, Rose & Lander, LLP | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 56 | 0.85 | 0.52 | 1.80 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Peter H. EhrenbergLowenstein SandlerFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in a filing · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Kenneth S. RoseMorse, Zelnick, Rose & Lander, LLPFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.41× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.63×
- Mitchell C. LittmanLittman KrooksFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 1.43× · 95% wipeout 2.47×
- Stephen R. ConnoniK&L GatesFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter H. EhrenbergLowenstein Sandler | Nov 2004 | Named in a filing | 32 | 0.98 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Kenneth S. RoseMorse, Zelnick, Rose & Lander, LLP | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 21 | 0.41 | 0.53 | 1.63 |
| Mitchell C. LittmanLittman Krooks | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 14 | 0.64 | 1.43 | 2.47 |
| Stephen R. ConnoniK&L Gates | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 7 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 0.69 |