VISANT CORP
CIK 1308085Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Apr 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gordon Feinblatt Rothman Hoffberger & HollanderFirst linked May 2008 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.42× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Calfee Halter & GriswoldFirst linked May 2007 · Named in a filing · 70 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.58×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.First linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 163 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLPFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 155 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gordon Feinblatt Rothman Hoffberger & Hollander | May 2008 | Named in a filing | 20 | 0.42 | 0.56 | 0.80 |
| Calfee Halter & Griswold | May 2007 | Named in a filing | 70 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 1.58 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Nov 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Cozen O'Connor P.C. | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 163 | 1.03 | 0.63 | 0.94 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 155 | 1.19 | 0.16 | 0.77 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karen Hsu KelleySimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jun 2005 | Text search only | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |