SOLAR ENERTECH CORP SOEN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1307873Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Mar 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Mar 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Richardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in a filing · 215 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Mar 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Richardson & Patel LLP | Apr 2007 | Named in a filing | 215 | 1.07 | 1.41 | 1.28 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Robert F. CharronEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Aug 2010 · Named in a filing · 62 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 1.11× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Eric WangDLA PiperFirst linked Mar 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.85× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Jody R. SamuelsRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.09× · Went dark 1.37× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Alexander H. Walker IIIFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.39× · Went dark 3.43× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert F. CharronEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Aug 2010 | Named in a filing | 62 | 1.42 | 1.11 | 1.26 |
| Eric WangDLA Piper | Mar 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 1.85 | 1.28 | 0.95 |
| Jody R. SamuelsRichardson & Patel LLP | Apr 2007 | Named in a filing | 13 | 2.09 | 1.37 | 1.07 |
| Alexander H. Walker III | Mar 2005 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.39 | 3.43 | 0.00 |