CEC Funding, LLC
CIK 1307488Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Palmer & DodgeFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in a filing · 98 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Nov 2004 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in a filing · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Foley HoagFirst linked Feb 2005 · Text search only · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Stradley Ronon Stevens & YoungFirst linked Feb 2005 · Text search only · 97 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 1,211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Palmer & Dodge | Nov 2004 | Named in a filing | 98 | 0.89 | 0.75 | 0.95 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Nov 2004 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.78 |
| Ropes & Gray | Nov 2004 | Named in a filing | 914 | 0.97 | 0.14 | 0.91 |
| Foley Hoag | Feb 2005 | Text search only | 186 | 0.72 | 0.95 | 1.14 |
| Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young | Feb 2005 | Text search only | 97 | 0.77 | 0.18 | 0.74 |
| Sidley Austin | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 1,211 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David A. FineRopes & GrayFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.95× · Went dark 1.71× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Eric TashmanSidley AustinFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.06× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Richard J. MorrisonRopes & GrayFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- STANLEY KELLERPalmer & DodgeFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David A. FineRopes & Gray | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 17 | 2.95 | 1.71 | 0.00 |
| Eric TashmanSidley Austin | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 6 | 2.06 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Richard J. MorrisonRopes & Gray | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| STANLEY KELLERPalmer & Dodge | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 10 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 0.00 |