Shell plc RDS-A (last ticker on record)
CIK 1306965Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked May 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Slaughter and MayFirst linked May 2005 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Ogilvy RenaultFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
- Stikeman ElliottFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 225 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jul 2005 · Text search only · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Davis PolkFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- for De Brauw Blackstone WestbroekFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Jones DayFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Mar 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | May 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Slaughter and May | May 2005 | Named in a filing | 35 | 1.64 | 0.00 | 1.22 |
| Ogilvy Renault | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 53 | 1.02 | 0.00 | 1.56 |
| Stikeman Elliott | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 225 | 1.08 | 0.11 | 1.06 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jul 2005 | Text search only | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Davis Polk | May 2005 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| for De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek | May 2005 | Text search only | 7 | 0.76 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Jones Day | May 2005 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew J. PittsCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Dec 2016 · Named in a filing · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Gregory M. ShawCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Jul 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Paul T. ShultzFirst linked Jul 2005 · Named in a filing · 136 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- William P. Rogers Jr.Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked May 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Andrew J. FoleyPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.46× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew J. PittsCravath Swaine & Moore | Dec 2016 | Named in a filing | 58 | 1.25 | 0.00 | 0.77 |
| Gregory M. ShawCravath Swaine & Moore | Jul 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 1.98 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Paul T. Shultz | Jul 2005 | Named in a filing | 136 | 1.34 | 0.18 | 1.49 |
| William P. Rogers Jr.Cravath Swaine & Moore | May 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 33 | 1.65 | 0.00 | 0.95 |
| Andrew J. FoleyPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 33 | 0.46 | 0.78 | 0.84 |