Celanese Corp CE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1306830Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Oct 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in a filing · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Jan 2005 · Text search only · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- White & CaseFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Mar 2007 | Named in a filing | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Nov 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Maples and Calder | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Jan 2005 | Text search only | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Davis Polk | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| White & Case | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Doug RayburnBaker Botts L.L.P.First linked Mar 2023 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
- Andrew L. FabensGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in a filing · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Barbara L. BeckerGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in a filing · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- James J. MoloneyGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in a filing · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.30×
- Igor FertSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Edward P. Tolley IIISimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.53×
- OR FORMATIONSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- William R. DoughertySimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Doug RayburnBaker Botts L.L.P. | Mar 2023 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.94 | 0.00 | 1.50 |
| Andrew L. FabensGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Feb 2011 | Named in a filing | 85 | 1.47 | 0.00 | 1.38 |
| Barbara L. BeckerGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Mar 2007 | Named in a filing | 31 | 1.64 | 0.00 | 1.46 |
| James J. MoloneyGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Mar 2007 | Named in a filing | 40 | 2.20 | 0.00 | 0.30 |
| Igor FertSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Dec 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 2.04 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Edward P. Tolley IIISimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Nov 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 58 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.53 |
| OR FORMATIONSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 160 | 1.27 | 0.15 | 0.90 |
| William R. DoughertySimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 20 | 2.66 | 0.00 | 1.11 |