World Monitor Trust III
CIK 1305201Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alston & BirdFirst linked Dec 2008 · Named in a filing · 583 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in a filing · 268 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Oct 2004 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Oct 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Cadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Coudert BrothersFirst linked Oct 2004 · Text search only · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.66× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Oct 2004 · Text search only · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alston & Bird | Dec 2008 | Named in a filing | 583 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.79 |
| Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Apr 2007 | Named in a filing | 268 | 0.76 | 0.58 | 1.22 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Oct 2004 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Sidley Austin | Oct 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 305 | 1.14 | 0.24 | 0.95 |
| Proskauer Rose | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
| Coudert Brothers | Oct 2004 | Text search only | 45 | 1.66 | 1.06 | 1.29 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Oct 2004 | Text search only | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Fred M. SantoROSENMAN & COLIN LLPFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Michael J. SchmidtbergerSidley AustinFirst linked Oct 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.35×
- Jim MunsellSidley AustinFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fred M. SantoROSENMAN & COLIN LLP | Apr 2007 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Michael J. SchmidtbergerSidley Austin | Oct 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.35 |
| Jim MunsellSidley Austin | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |