Advanced BioHealing Inc
CIK 1305108Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Dewey & LeBoeuf LLPFirst linked May 2011 · Text search only · 126 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.15×
- Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLPFirst linked Feb 2011 · Text search only · 98 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Wiggin and DanaFirst linked Feb 2011 · Text search only · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2011 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP | May 2011 | Text search only | 126 | 1.60 | 0.00 | 0.15 |
| Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP | Feb 2011 | Text search only | 98 | 0.65 | 0.85 | 1.34 |
| Wiggin and Dana | Feb 2011 | Text search only | 56 | 0.82 | 0.30 | 1.37 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Charles K. RuckLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in a filing · 74 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Matthew T. BushLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in a filing · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.21× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- B. Shayne KennedyLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2011 · Text search only · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charles K. RuckLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2011 | Named in a filing | 74 | 1.30 | 0.35 | 0.69 |
| Matthew T. BushLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2011 | Named in a filing | 50 | 0.21 | 0.00 | 1.23 |
| B. Shayne KennedyLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2011 | Text search only | 43 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 1.19 |