ASHLAND LLC ASH (last ticker on record)
CIK 1305014Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Squire Sanders (US)First linked Aug 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Oct 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Wyatt Tarrant & CombsFirst linked Oct 2004 · Named in a filing · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Patton BoggsFirst linked Oct 2004 · Text search only · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Steptoe & JohnsonFirst linked Oct 2004 · Text search only · 80 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.65× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Squire Sanders (US) | Aug 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 199 | 0.88 | 0.98 | 1.13 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Oct 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Wyatt Tarrant & Combs | Oct 2004 | Named in a filing | 53 | 1.40 | 0.35 | 1.08 |
| Shearman & Sterling | May 2013 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Patton Boggs | Oct 2004 | Text search only | 186 | 0.92 | 0.76 | 1.35 |
| Steptoe & Johnson | Oct 2004 | Text search only | 80 | 1.10 | 0.65 | 1.34 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew J. PittsCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked May 2013 · Named in a filing · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Jeffrey J. MarguliesSquire Sanders (US)First linked Aug 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- James C. WooleryCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Oct 2004 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.70×
- Susan WebsterCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Oct 2004 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew J. PittsCravath Swaine & Moore | May 2013 | Named in a filing | 58 | 1.25 | 0.00 | 0.77 |
| Jeffrey J. MarguliesSquire Sanders (US) | Aug 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.91 |
| James C. WooleryCravath Swaine & Moore | Oct 2004 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.59 | 0.00 | 1.70 |
| Susan WebsterCravath Swaine & Moore | Oct 2004 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.34 | 0.00 | 0.00 |