TD BANKNORTH INC. BNK (last ticker on record)
CIK 1304994Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Elias, Matz, Tiernan & Herrick L.L.P.First linked Oct 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 147 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.43×
- Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLPFirst linked Oct 2004 · Named in a filing · 155 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- McInnes CooperFirst linked Dec 2006 · Text search only · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Dec 2006 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Macpherson Leslie & TyermanFirst linked Dec 2004 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elias, Matz, Tiernan & Herrick L.L.P. | Oct 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 147 | 0.62 | 0.38 | 0.43 |
| Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP | Oct 2004 | Named in a filing | 155 | 1.19 | 0.16 | 0.77 |
| McInnes Cooper | Dec 2006 | Text search only | 34 | 1.14 | 0.48 | 1.14 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Dec 2006 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Macpherson Leslie & Tyerman | Dec 2004 | Text search only | 14 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 0.73 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ronald H. JanisPitney HardinFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Gerard L. HawkinsElias, Matz, Tiernan & Herrick L.L.P.First linked Oct 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.50× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- John F. KennedyFirst linked Dec 2006 · Text search only · 190 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Gerald F. Heupel Jr.Elias, Matz, Tiernan & Herrick L.L.P.First linked Dec 2004 · Text search only · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ronald H. JanisPitney Hardin | Sep 2005 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.18 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Gerard L. HawkinsElias, Matz, Tiernan & Herrick L.L.P. | Oct 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 1.50 | 1.33 | 0.58 |
| John F. Kennedy | Dec 2006 | Text search only | 190 | 1.52 | 0.60 | 1.17 |
| Gerald F. Heupel Jr.Elias, Matz, Tiernan & Herrick L.L.P. | Dec 2004 | Text search only | 27 | 1.24 | 0.57 | 0.00 |