CARDIODX INC
CIK 1304909Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Jul 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Fenwick & West LLPFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 443 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Foley HoagFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLPFirst linked Oct 2013 · Text search only · 98 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooley LLP | Jul 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Fenwick & West LLP | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 443 | 0.95 | 0.21 | 1.23 |
| Foley Hoag | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 186 | 0.72 | 0.95 | 1.17 |
| Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP | Oct 2013 | Text search only | 98 | 0.65 | 0.85 | 1.34 |
| Goodwin Procter | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David PeinsippCooley LLPFirst linked Jul 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 86 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
- Mark B. WeeksCooley LLPFirst linked Jul 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Stanley F. PiersonPillsbury WinthropFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.00×
- Steve TonsfeldtCooley LLPFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David PeinsippCooley LLP | Jul 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 86 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 1.55 |
| Mark B. WeeksCooley LLP | Jul 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 38 | 0.00 | 0.61 | 0.56 |
| Stanley F. PiersonPillsbury Winthrop | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 11 | 1.66 | 0.00 | 2.00 |
| Steve TonsfeldtCooley LLP | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 8 | 1.08 | 0.00 | 0.72 |