TRI-S SECURITY CORP TRIS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1304901Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Aug 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- 96%
- Nov 2005 to Aug 2009
- Law firms
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rogers & Hardin | Oct 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 38 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 1.19 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- ALAN C. LEETRogers & HardinFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.79×
- Lori A. GelchionRogers & HardinFirst linked Oct 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Robert C. HussleRogers & HardinFirst linked Oct 2004 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Steven E. FoxRogers & HardinFirst linked Oct 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Kenneth E. MooreReitner, Stuart & MooreFirst linked Oct 2004 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALAN C. LEETRogers & Hardin | Feb 2006 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.45 | 0.00 | 3.79 |
| Lori A. GelchionRogers & Hardin | Oct 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| Robert C. HussleRogers & Hardin | Oct 2004 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Steven E. FoxRogers & Hardin | Oct 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 1.22 |
| Kenneth E. MooreReitner, Stuart & Moore | Oct 2004 | Text search only | 20 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 0.55 |