Horizon Lines, Inc. HRZL (last ticker on record)

CIK 1302707Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

Delisting notice (not a red flag)
SEC/DOJ scrutiny
Restructuring

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 2; Newest began Nov 2014
Largest fall in its shares: —; None of 95% on record
Law firms: 12; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 9; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

Nov 17, 2014Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Dec 7, 2012Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Oct 27, 2011Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Sep 29, 2011Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Feb 24, 2011A filing mentions cooperating with the Justice DepartmentForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Nov 12, 2008Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 25, 2008A filing mentions cooperating with the Justice DepartmentForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
Apr 18, 2008A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Feb 6, 2007Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 18, 2006Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Kirkland & Ellis	Aug 2011	Named in SEC correspondence	1,686	0.98	0.17	0.87
McGuireWoods LLP	Feb 2008	Named in SEC correspondence	358	0.97	0.85	1.11
Cahill Gordon & Reindel	Mar 2005	Named in SEC correspondence	598	1.03	0.18	0.77
Schulte Roth & Zabel	Mar 2005	Named in SEC correspondence	296	0.93	0.44	0.99
Shearman & Sterling	Aug 2012	Text search only	2,649	1.21	0.13	0.87
Carlsmith Ball	Sep 2011	Text search only	9	1.16	0.00	1.68
Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison	Sep 2011	Text search only	826	1.02	0.18	0.83
Blank Rome	Sep 2005	Text search only	348	1.04	0.79	1.36
Dykema Gossett	Mar 2005	Text search only	115	0.95	0.23	0.87
Latham & Watkins LLP	Mar 2005	Text search only	2,667	0.98	0.31	1.10
Seward & Kissel	Mar 2005	Text search only	164	0.78	0.19	1.28
Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz	Mar 2005	Text search only	889	1.31	0.07	0.59

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Christian O. NaglerKirkland & Ellis	Aug 2011	Named in SEC correspondence	260	0.89	0.00	1.01
Jason K. ZacharyKirkland & Ellis	Aug 2011	Named in SEC correspondence	20	1.05	0.00	0.49
Jason H. ScottMcGuireWoods LLP	Feb 2008	Named in a filing	8	2.16	1.07	1.90
James NicollSchulte Roth & Zabel	Jul 2005	Named in SEC correspondence	7	1.16	0.00	1.48
Andre WeissSchulte Roth & Zabel	Mar 2005	Named in SEC correspondence	14	0.60	0.00	1.22
Richard E. FarleyCahill Gordon & Reindel	Mar 2005	Named in SEC correspondence	11	3.12	0.00	0.90
John F. Kennedy	May 2006	Text search only	190	1.52	0.60	1.17
David S. DantzicLatham & Watkins LLP	Mar 2005	Text search only	10	2.68	0.00	0.00
Gary J. WolfeSeward & Kissel	Mar 2005	Text search only	47	1.08	0.00	2.65