OncoMed Pharmaceuticals Inc OMED (last ticker on record)
CIK 1302573Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Oct 2018
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Jan 2014 to Dec 2018
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Mar 2019 · Named in a filing · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked May 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked May 2018 · Text search only · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Reed SmithFirst linked Jun 2015 · Text search only · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLPFirst linked May 2012 · Text search only · 98 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Bodman LLPFirst linked May 2012 · Text search only · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Holme Roberts & Owen LLPFirst linked May 2012 · Text search only · 99 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked May 2012 · Text search only · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked May 2012 · Text search only · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Mar 2019 | Named in a filing | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Covington & Burling | May 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.99 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | May 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Cooley LLP | May 2018 | Text search only | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Reed Smith | Jun 2015 | Text search only | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
| Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP | May 2012 | Text search only | 98 | 0.65 | 0.85 | 1.34 |
| Bodman LLP | May 2012 | Text search only | 26 | 2.05 | 0.00 | 1.13 |
| Holme Roberts & Owen LLP | May 2012 | Text search only | 99 | 1.31 | 0.90 | 1.28 |
| Morrison & Foerster | May 2012 | Text search only | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| Paul Hastings | May 2012 | Text search only | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brian D. PaulsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Alan C. MendelsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Donald J. MurrayCovington & BurlingFirst linked May 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Mark V. RoederLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian D. PaulsonLatham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 0.35 | 0.00 | 1.26 |
| Alan C. MendelsonLatham & Watkins LLP | May 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 95 | 0.60 | 0.19 | 1.35 |
| Donald J. MurrayCovington & Burling | May 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 1.20 | 0.59 | 1.19 |
| Mark V. RoederLatham & Watkins LLP | May 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.32 |