Akrion, Inc.
CIK 1302051Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Oct 2004 · Named in a filing · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Blank RomeFirst linked Jul 2007 · Text search only · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Fenwick & West LLPFirst linked Jul 2007 · Text search only · 443 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Jul 2007 · Text search only · 558 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.First linked Oct 2004 · Text search only · 163 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Oct 2004 · Text search only · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Oct 2004 | Named in a filing | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.23 |
| Blank Rome | Jul 2007 | Text search only | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.37 |
| Fenwick & West LLP | Jul 2007 | Text search only | 443 | 0.95 | 0.21 | 1.23 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Jul 2007 | Text search only | 558 | 0.98 | 0.61 | 1.10 |
| Cozen O'Connor P.C. | Oct 2004 | Text search only | 163 | 1.03 | 0.63 | 0.98 |
| HALE AND DORR | Oct 2004 | Text search only | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.22 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Peter B. TarrHALE AND DORRFirst linked Oct 2004 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
- Richard J. BusisCozen O'Connor P.C.First linked Oct 2004 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Stuart R. NaymanHALE AND DORRFirst linked Oct 2004 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.39×
- William R. SchreiberFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Jul 2007 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.19×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter B. TarrHALE AND DORR | Oct 2004 | Named in a filing | 17 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 1.61 |
| Richard J. BusisCozen O'Connor P.C. | Oct 2004 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.79 |
| Stuart R. NaymanHALE AND DORR | Oct 2004 | Named in a filing | 23 | 0.29 | 0.00 | 0.39 |
| William R. SchreiberFenwick & West LLP | Jul 2007 | Text search only | 16 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 2.19 |