Language Line, Inc.
CIK 1301399Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Sep 2004 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Edwards & AngellFirst linked Sep 2004 · Text search only · 81 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Sep 2004 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Schiff HardinFirst linked Sep 2004 · Text search only · 184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Vedder PriceFirst linked Sep 2004 · Text search only · 144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Sep 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Sep 2004 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Edwards & Angell | Sep 2004 | Text search only | 81 | 0.68 | 0.59 | 1.15 |
| Morgan Lewis | Sep 2004 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Schiff Hardin | Sep 2004 | Text search only | 184 | 0.78 | 0.85 | 1.26 |
| Vedder Price | Sep 2004 | Text search only | 144 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.94 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joshua N. KorffKirkland & EllisFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Jonathan A. SchaffzinCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Sep 2004 · Text search only · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joshua N. KorffKirkland & Ellis | Sep 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 107 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 1.43 |
| Jonathan A. SchaffzinCahill Gordon & Reindel | Sep 2004 | Text search only | 21 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 0.51 |