SKINS INC. LGIC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1300744Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Aug 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Burton, Bartlett & GlogovacFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 1.58× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Joseph I. Emas Attorney at LawFirst linked May 2009 · Text search only · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.43× · Went dark 1.26× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Preston Gates & EllisFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 159 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Clark Wilson LLPFirst linked Sep 2004 · Text search only · 204 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 1.43× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burton, Bartlett & Glogovac | Oct 2006 | Named in a filing | 23 | 0.35 | 1.58 | 1.02 |
| K&L Gates | Mar 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Joseph I. Emas Attorney at Law | May 2009 | Text search only | 85 | 1.43 | 1.26 | 0.98 |
| Preston Gates & Ellis | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 159 | 1.36 | 1.62 | 1.44 |
| Clark Wilson LLP | Sep 2004 | Text search only | 204 | 0.72 | 1.43 | 1.11 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joseph I. EmasJoseph I. Emas Attorney at LawFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in a filing · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 1.27× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Anh Q. TranK&L GatesFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.54× · Went dark 1.32× · 95% wipeout 1.78×
- Thomas J. PolettiK&L GatesFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 71 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 1.24× · 95% wipeout 1.75×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joseph I. EmasJoseph I. Emas Attorney at Law | Nov 2008 | Named in a filing | 107 | 1.38 | 1.27 | 0.83 |
| Anh Q. TranK&L Gates | Apr 2006 | Named in a filing | 12 | 2.54 | 1.32 | 1.78 |
| Thomas J. PolettiK&L Gates | Apr 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 71 | 1.51 | 1.24 | 1.75 |