Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. CHCI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1299969Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Nov 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Feb 2005 to Jul 2008
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alston & BirdFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in a filing · 583 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Akerman LLPFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Aug 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Aug 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSONFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alston & Bird | Jul 2012 | Named in a filing | 583 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.79 |
| Akerman LLP | Nov 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 211 | 1.09 | 0.67 | 1.36 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Aug 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Hunton & Williams | Aug 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSON | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 58 | 1.13 | 0.57 | 1.27 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David A. BrownAlston & BirdFirst linked May 2014 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Julie A. MediamolleAlston & BirdFirst linked May 2014 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Kenneth G. AlberstadtAkerman LLPFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Jason T. SimonGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Oct 2004 · Named in a filing · 120 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- RANDALL S. PARKSHunton & WilliamsFirst linked Aug 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David A. BrownAlston & Bird | May 2014 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Julie A. MediamolleAlston & Bird | May 2014 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Kenneth G. AlberstadtAkerman LLP | Nov 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.13 |
| Jason T. SimonGreenberg Traurig | Oct 2004 | Named in a filing | 120 | 0.68 | 0.30 | 1.11 |
| RANDALL S. PARKSHunton & Williams | Aug 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.39 | 0.00 | 2.00 |