TearLab Corp TEAR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1299139Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began May 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jul 2013 to Apr 2020
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jul 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked Aug 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Torys LLPFirst linked Aug 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 170 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Holland & KnightFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Stikeman ElliottFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 225 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Thompson CoburnFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- David E. WiseFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.32× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jul 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Piper Rudnick | Aug 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.82 |
| Torys LLP | Aug 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 170 | 1.22 | 0.44 | 0.94 |
| Holland & Knight | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 413 | 1.17 | 0.82 | 1.19 |
| Morgan Lewis | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Stikeman Elliott | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 225 | 1.08 | 0.11 | 1.06 |
| Thompson Coburn | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 85 | 1.13 | 1.01 | 1.33 |
| David E. Wise | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 15 | 0.00 | 1.32 | 0.55 |
| DLA Piper | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dan HorwoodWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Apr 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.83× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.43×
- Martin J. WatersWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Oct 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.91× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 2.49×
- Robert F. KornegayWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jun 2013 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Anthony G. MaurielloWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 1.75× · 95% wipeout 1.74×
- Marjorie Sybul AdamsDLA PiperFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Andrew J. BeckTorys LLPFirst linked Aug 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 2.11× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- David E. WiseDavid E. WiseFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 1.19× · 95% wipeout 0.39×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dan HorwoodWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Apr 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 3.83 | 0.00 | 2.43 |
| Martin J. WatersWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Oct 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 1.91 | 0.88 | 2.49 |
| Robert F. KornegayWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jun 2013 | Named in a filing | 29 | 1.09 | 0.00 | 1.49 |
| Anthony G. MaurielloWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Oct 2012 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.15 | 1.75 | 1.74 |
| Marjorie Sybul AdamsDLA Piper | Sep 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 1.30 |
| Andrew J. BeckTorys LLP | Aug 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 1.08 | 2.11 | 1.15 |
| David E. WiseDavid E. Wise | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 22 | 0.84 | 1.19 | 0.39 |