Horizon Lines Holding Corp. HRZ (last ticker on record)
CIK 1299064Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Carlsmith BallFirst linked Sep 2011 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.68×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Aug 2012 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Sep 2011 · Text search only · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlsmith Ball | Sep 2011 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.16 | 0.00 | 1.68 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Aug 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | Mar 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 0.99 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Aug 2012 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Sep 2011 | Text search only | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Christian O. NaglerKirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 260 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Jason K. ZacharyKirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
- Andre WeissSchulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- David S. DantzicLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christian O. NaglerKirkland & Ellis | Aug 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 260 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Jason K. ZacharyKirkland & Ellis | Aug 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.49 |
| Andre WeissSchulte Roth & Zabel | Mar 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 1.22 |
| David S. DantzicLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 10 | 2.68 | 0.00 | 0.00 |