PetroHunter Energy Corp PHUN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1298824Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dill Dill Carr Stonbraker & Hutchings, P.C.First linked Jun 2008 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.05× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- O'Neill LawFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 1.81× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Gordon Hughes & BanksFirst linked Jun 2008 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 1.16× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Patton BoggsFirst linked Jun 2008 · Text search only · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Cane Clark LLPFirst linked Sep 2004 · Text search only · 143 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Lang Michener LLPFirst linked Sep 2004 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dill Dill Carr Stonbraker & Hutchings, P.C. | Jun 2008 | Named in a filing | 30 | 0.00 | 2.05 | 0.52 |
| O'Neill Law | Sep 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 51 | 0.40 | 1.81 | 0.92 |
| Gordon Hughes & Banks | Jun 2008 | Text search only | 24 | 0.86 | 1.16 | 1.39 |
| Patton Boggs | Jun 2008 | Text search only | 186 | 0.92 | 0.76 | 1.35 |
| Cane Clark LLP | Sep 2004 | Text search only | 143 | 1.25 | 1.17 | 0.97 |
| Lang Michener LLP | Sep 2004 | Text search only | 90 | 1.14 | 1.17 | 1.01 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- FAY M. MATSUKAGEDill Dill Carr Stonbraker & Hutchings, P.C.First linked Jun 2008 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.36× · Went dark 2.08× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Conrad Y. NestO'Neill LawFirst linked Jan 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 1.72× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Michael H. TaylorLang Michener LLPFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in a filing · 68 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 1.14× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Christian I. CuO'Neill LawFirst linked Jan 2005 · Text search only · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.45× · Went dark 1.56× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAY M. MATSUKAGEDill Dill Carr Stonbraker & Hutchings, P.C. | Jun 2008 | Named in a filing | 25 | 0.36 | 2.08 | 0.66 |
| Conrad Y. NestO'Neill Law | Jan 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 0.66 | 1.72 | 1.31 |
| Michael H. TaylorLang Michener LLP | Sep 2004 | Named in a filing | 68 | 1.40 | 1.14 | 0.90 |
| Christian I. CuO'Neill Law | Jan 2005 | Text search only | 42 | 0.45 | 1.56 | 1.24 |