Trubion Pharmaceuticals, Inc TRBN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1298521Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Feb 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- 95%
- Feb 2007 to Dec 2008
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bingham McCutchenFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in a filing · 291 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Fenwick & West LLPFirst linked Jun 2008 · Named in a filing · 443 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jun 2006 · Text search only · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bingham McCutchen | Nov 2010 | Named in a filing | 291 | 0.94 | 0.38 | 1.04 |
| Fenwick & West LLP | Jun 2008 | Named in a filing | 443 | 0.95 | 0.21 | 1.23 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jun 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.41 |
| Davis Polk | Jun 2006 | Text search only | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Laurie A. CervenyMorgan LewisFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 1.30× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
- Alan C. SmithFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Jun 2008 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Mark J. HandfeltVENTURE LAW GROUPFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.76×
- Patrick J. SchultheisWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laurie A. CervenyMorgan Lewis | Nov 2010 | Named in a filing | 22 | 1.32 | 1.30 | 0.51 |
| Alan C. SmithFenwick & West LLP | Jun 2008 | Named in a filing | 27 | 0.62 | 0.79 | 1.38 |
| Mark J. HandfeltVENTURE LAW GROUP | Jun 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 1.63 | 0.00 | 1.76 |
| Patrick J. SchultheisWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jun 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 38 | 1.02 | 0.72 | 1.33 |