Nalco Holding CO NLC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1298341Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jun 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Oct 2011 · Named in a filing · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2008 · Named in a filing · 1,688 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Aug 2004 · Named in a filing · 1,397 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker & McKenzie | Oct 2011 | Named in a filing | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 0.96 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Mar 2008 | Named in a filing | 1,688 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Aug 2004 | Named in a filing | 1,397 | 1.27 | 0.11 | 0.88 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 889 | 1.29 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Edward P. Tolley IIISimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Aug 2004 · Named in a filing · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Richard A. FenyesSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Aug 2004 · Named in a filing · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.30×
- Daniel A. NeffWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 75 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Wilson S. NeelySimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.50× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edward P. Tolley IIISimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Aug 2004 | Named in a filing | 58 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.66 |
| Richard A. FenyesSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Aug 2004 | Named in a filing | 39 | 0.36 | 0.00 | 0.30 |
| Daniel A. NeffWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 75 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 0.78 |
| Wilson S. NeelySimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 18 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 1.50 |