Cambridge Display Technology, Inc. OLED (last ticker on record)
CIK 1297968Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Jul 2004 · Named in a filing · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Jul 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Shaw PittmanFirst linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Brown & AssociatesFirst linked Dec 2004 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Dec 2004 · Text search only · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Squire Sanders (US)First linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debevoise & Plimpton | Jul 2004 | Named in a filing | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 1.04 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Jul 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Shaw Pittman | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 149 | 0.98 | 0.53 | 1.08 |
| Brown & Associates | Dec 2004 | Text search only | 19 | 1.19 | 0.47 | 0.55 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Dec 2004 | Text search only | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| Squire Sanders (US) | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 199 | 0.88 | 0.98 | 1.13 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd W. EcklandPillsbury Winthrop | Jul 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.57 | 0.00 | 0.93 |