INOLIFE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. INOL (last ticker on record)
CIK 1297965Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jun 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jan 2013 to Jan 2014
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Lanham & LanhamFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.45× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Bart and Associates, LLCFirst linked May 2013 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.80× · Went dark 6.06× · 95% wipeout 1.63×
- Jonathan D. LeinwandFirst linked Feb 2010 · Named in a filing · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 1.55× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lanham & Lanham | Jun 2016 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.34 | 1.45 | 0.00 |
| Bart and Associates, LLC | May 2013 | Named in a filing | 21 | 1.80 | 6.06 | 1.63 |
| Jonathan D. Leinwand | Feb 2010 | Named in a filing | 42 | 1.11 | 1.55 | 1.26 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Randall LanhamLanham & LanhamFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 4.18× · Went dark 2.11× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Ken BartBart and Associates, LLCFirst linked May 2013 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.58× · Went dark 5.72× · 95% wipeout 2.45×
- John T. Root Jr.First linked Jan 2013 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 1.90×
- Jonathan D. LeinwandJonathan D. LeinwandFirst linked Feb 2010 · Named in a filing · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 1.82× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Robert BrantlBRESSLER, AMERY & ROSS, P.C.First linked Jul 2004 · Named in a filing · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 2.29× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Randall LanhamLanham & Lanham | Jun 2016 | Named in a filing | 5 | 4.18 | 2.11 | 0.89 |
| Ken BartBart and Associates, LLC | May 2013 | Named in a filing | 21 | 2.58 | 5.72 | 2.45 |
| John T. Root Jr. | Jan 2013 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.70 | 0.62 | 1.90 |
| Jonathan D. LeinwandJonathan D. Leinwand | Feb 2010 | Named in a filing | 41 | 1.19 | 1.82 | 1.17 |
| Robert BrantlBRESSLER, AMERY & ROSS, P.C. | Jul 2004 | Named in a filing | 44 | 0.96 | 2.29 | 1.13 |