Celanese Holdings LLC
CIK 1297288Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Feb 2005 · Text search only · 630 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 1,397 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- White & CaseFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dorsey & Whitney LLP | Feb 2005 | Text search only | 630 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 1.14 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 0.96 |
| Davis Polk | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 1,397 | 1.27 | 0.11 | 0.88 |
| White & Case | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Robert L. FriedmanSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Feb 2005 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Edward P. Tolley IIISimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- OR FORMATIONSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert L. FriedmanSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Feb 2005 | Text search only | 10 | 2.18 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Edward P. Tolley IIISimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 58 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.66 |
| OR FORMATIONSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 160 | 1.27 | 0.15 | 0.83 |