HS3 TECHNOLOGIES INC. HSTH (last ticker on record)
CIK 1297203Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Aug 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- W.L. MACDONALD LAW CORPORATIONFirst linked Feb 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 75 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.84× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Clark Wilson LLPFirst linked Oct 2007 · Named in a filing · 204 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 1.43× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Gordon Hughes & BanksFirst linked Oct 2007 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 1.16× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W.L. MACDONALD LAW CORPORATION | Feb 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 75 | 1.23 | 1.84 | 1.49 |
| Clark Wilson LLP | Oct 2007 | Named in a filing | 204 | 0.72 | 1.43 | 1.11 |
| Gordon Hughes & Banks | Oct 2007 | Text search only | 24 | 0.86 | 1.16 | 1.39 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- William L. MacdonaldClark Wilson LLPFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 92 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 1.39× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Warren J. SoloskiFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 1.68× · 95% wipeout 0.21×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William L. MacdonaldClark Wilson LLP | Mar 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 92 | 0.80 | 1.39 | 0.96 |
| Warren J. Soloski | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 40 | 1.56 | 1.68 | 0.21 |