The9 LTD NCTY (last ticker on record)
CIK 1296774Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hunter Taubman FischerFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in a filing · 251 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.77× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Grandall Law FirmFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Jun 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 841 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Apr 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Zhong Lun Law FirmFirst linked Apr 2016 · Named in a filing · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in a filing · 1,145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Aug 2020 · Text search only · 1,185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Aug 2020 · Text search only · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 2012 · Text search only · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Commerce & Finance Law OfficesFirst linked Dec 2004 · Text search only · 157 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hunter Taubman Fischer | Mar 2021 | Named in a filing | 251 | 1.06 | 1.77 | 1.14 |
| Grandall Law Firm | Aug 2020 | Named in a filing | 36 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 1.33 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Jun 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 841 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.13 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Apr 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.82 |
| Zhong Lun Law Firm | Apr 2016 | Named in a filing | 90 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2004 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Maples and Calder | Nov 2004 | Named in a filing | 1,145 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.90 |
| DLA Piper | Aug 2020 | Text search only | 1,185 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.17 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Aug 2020 | Text search only | 826 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.14 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Nov 2012 | Text search only | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| Commerce & Finance Law Offices | Dec 2004 | Text search only | 157 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 0.98 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.14 |
| Davis Polk | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Angela M. DowdLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Jun 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 1.45× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Eugene Y. LeeLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2008 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- David T. ZhangKirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in a filing · 118 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Fan ZhangKirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 2012 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Cayman Europe AsiaFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- John A. OtoshiLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.77× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angela M. DowdLoeb & Loeb LLP | Jun 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 34 | 0.94 | 1.45 | 1.44 |
| Eugene Y. LeeLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2008 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 0.63 |
| David T. ZhangKirkland & Ellis | Nov 2004 | Named in a filing | 118 | 1.03 | 0.61 | 1.24 |
| Fan ZhangKirkland & Ellis | Nov 2012 | Text search only | 8 | 2.29 | 0.00 | 0.81 |
| Cayman Europe Asia | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 14 | 1.75 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| John A. OtoshiLatham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 24 | 1.77 | 1.17 | 1.36 |