ZAGG Inc ZAGG (last ticker on record)
CIK 1296205Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Nov 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Durham Jones & PinegarFirst linked Jan 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- Cane Clark LLPFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in a filing · 143 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Durham Jones & Pinegar | Jan 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 47 | 1.70 | 1.06 | 1.40 |
| Cane Clark LLP | Dec 2005 | Named in a filing | 143 | 1.25 | 1.17 | 0.97 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jeffrey M. JonesDurham Jones & PinegarFirst linked May 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.18× · Went dark 0.92× · 95% wipeout 1.91×
- Kyleen E. CaneCane Clark LLPFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in a filing · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Scott DoneyThe Doney Law FirmFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in a filing · 121 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 1.39× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Bryan R. ClarkCane Clark LLPFirst linked Dec 2005 · Text search only · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Chad WienerCane Clark LLPFirst linked Dec 2005 · Text search only · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey M. JonesDurham Jones & Pinegar | May 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 2.18 | 0.92 | 1.91 |
| Kyleen E. CaneCane Clark LLP | Dec 2005 | Named in a filing | 46 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.99 |
| Scott DoneyThe Doney Law Firm | Dec 2005 | Named in a filing | 121 | 1.04 | 1.39 | 0.86 |
| Bryan R. ClarkCane Clark LLP | Dec 2005 | Text search only | 77 | 0.95 | 0.85 | 1.22 |
| Chad WienerCane Clark LLP | Dec 2005 | Text search only | 29 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 1.10 |