MISCOR GROUP, LTD. MIGL (last ticker on record)
CIK 1295503Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in a filing · 398 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Ulmer & BerneFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in a filing · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.49× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Barnes & ThornburgFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 167 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Benesch Friedlander Coplan & AronoffFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Mintz LLPFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Williams Kastner & GibbsFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 1.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrews Kurth LLP | Apr 2013 | Named in a filing | 398 | 1.27 | 0.35 | 1.30 |
| Ulmer & Berne | Dec 2012 | Named in a filing | 34 | 1.22 | 0.49 | 1.18 |
| Barnes & Thornburg | Nov 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 167 | 1.07 | 0.70 | 0.86 |
| Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 55 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.31 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| Mintz LLP | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Williams Kastner & Gibbs | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 11 | 1.68 | 1.71 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- G. Michael O LearyAndrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.92× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- George J. VlahakosAndrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Michael O LearyAndrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Apr 2013 · Text search only · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G. Michael O LearyAndrews Kurth LLP | Apr 2013 | Named in a filing | 30 | 0.85 | 0.92 | 1.11 |
| George J. VlahakosAndrews Kurth LLP | Apr 2013 | Named in a filing | 30 | 1.02 | 0.00 | 0.82 |
| Michael O LearyAndrews Kurth LLP | Apr 2013 | Text search only | 67 | 1.30 | 0.56 | 1.11 |