CapForce Inc. CFOR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1293818Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Aug 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jul 2015 to Dec 2024
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Nov 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Hogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Dec 2019 · Text search only · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Linklaters LLPFirst linked Nov 2019 · Text search only · 156 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Apr 2015 · Text search only · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Nov 2014 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Michael Best & FriedrichFirst linked Nov 2014 · Text search only · 65 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ballard Spahr | Nov 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| Hogan Lovells US LLP | Dec 2019 | Text search only | 487 | 0.96 | 0.26 | 0.85 |
| Linklaters LLP | Nov 2019 | Text search only | 156 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.63 |
| Cooley LLP | Apr 2015 | Text search only | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Goodwin Procter | Nov 2014 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Michael Best & Friedrich | Nov 2014 | Text search only | 65 | 1.51 | 0.48 | 0.61 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Peter JaslowBallard SpahrFirst linked Jan 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.73× · Went dark 7.05× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- Mark A. CatchurShumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLPFirst linked Jul 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.26×
- Richard BaumannEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 2.06× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Mary J. MullanyBallard SpahrFirst linked Nov 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.77×
- Scott I. SonnenblickLinklaters LLPFirst linked Nov 2019 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Jay YamamotoSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Mar 2019 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.48× · Went dark 2.70× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- Gregory J. LynchMichael Best & FriedrichFirst linked Nov 2014 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.80× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
- Joseph C. Theis Jr.Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Nov 2014 · Text search only · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter JaslowBallard Spahr | Jan 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 3.73 | 7.05 | 0.63 |
| Mark A. CatchurShumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP | Jul 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 1.57 | 0.00 | 2.26 |
| Richard BaumannEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Mar 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 1.62 | 2.06 | 1.47 |
| Mary J. MullanyBallard Spahr | Nov 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 1.62 | 0.00 | 1.77 |
| Scott I. SonnenblickLinklaters LLP | Nov 2019 | Text search only | 8 | 1.53 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Jay YamamotoSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Mar 2019 | Text search only | 14 | 1.48 | 2.70 | 0.67 |
| Gregory J. LynchMichael Best & Friedrich | Nov 2014 | Text search only | 9 | 0.00 | 2.80 | 0.55 |
| Joseph C. Theis Jr.Goodwin Procter | Nov 2014 | Text search only | 31 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 1.01 |