TechTarget Holdings Inc. TTGT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1293282Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Oct 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- 95%
- Nov 2021 to Nov 2025
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Burns & Levinson LLPFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Gunderson DettmerFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 333 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Morse Barnes-Brown & PendletonFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.63×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwin Procter | Feb 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| HALE AND DORR | Feb 2007 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Feb 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Burns & Levinson LLP | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 35 | 1.35 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Gunderson Dettmer | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 333 | 1.17 | 0.66 | 1.32 |
| Morse Barnes-Brown & Pendleton | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 22 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 1.63 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Erika L. RobinsonWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Nov 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Jennifer BerrentHALE AND DORRFirst linked May 2014 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.79×
- Michael J. LaCasciaWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Graham RobinsonSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- James R. BurkeWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- John J. Egan IIIGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.03× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
- Mark G. BordenWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 66 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 1.62×
- Richard R. HespGunderson DettmerFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.70×
- Suzanne D. LecarozGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erika L. RobinsonWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Nov 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 42 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 1.20 |
| Jennifer BerrentHALE AND DORR | May 2014 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.90 | 0.00 | 1.79 |
| Michael J. LaCasciaWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Sep 2013 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.42 | 0.00 | 1.26 |
| Graham RobinsonSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Oct 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 42 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 0.69 |
| James R. BurkeWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Aug 2007 | Named in a filing | 20 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 0.86 |
| John J. Egan IIIGoodwin Procter | Feb 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.00 | 2.03 | 1.59 |
| Mark G. BordenWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Feb 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 66 | 1.51 | 0.43 | 1.62 |
| Richard R. HespGunderson Dettmer | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.70 |
| Suzanne D. LecarozGoodwin Procter | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 13 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 0.74 |