Homex Development Corp.
CIK 1293153Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 6-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dewey & LeBoeuf LLPFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 126 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.14×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in a filing · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Oct 2005 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- White & CaseFirst linked Oct 2005 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Ziegler Ziegler & AssociatesFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP | Aug 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 126 | 1.60 | 0.00 | 0.14 |
| Mayer Brown | Jun 2004 | Named in a filing | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.93 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Jun 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 439 | 1.01 | 0.35 | 0.70 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Oct 2005 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| White & Case | Oct 2005 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.14 |
| Ziegler Ziegler & Associates | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 37 | 0.92 | 0.62 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Edward S. BestMayer BrownFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
- Michael L. FitzgeraldMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edward S. BestMayer Brown | Jun 2004 | Named in a filing | 36 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 0.68 |
| Michael L. FitzgeraldMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Jun 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 3.29 | 0.00 | 0.00 |