Egenera, Inc.
CIK 1293139Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in a filing · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Gesmer UpdegroveFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.43×
- Gunderson DettmerFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 333 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Heller EhrmanFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLPFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 150 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HALE AND DORR | Jun 2004 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jun 2004 | Named in a filing | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Gesmer Updegrove | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 9 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 2.43 |
| Gunderson Dettmer | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 333 | 1.17 | 0.66 | 1.32 |
| Heller Ehrman | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 256 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.96 |
| Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLP | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 150 | 1.08 | 0.42 | 1.31 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mark G. BordenWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in a filing · 66 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 1.62×
- Peter B. TarrHALE AND DORRFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.77×
- Jay K. HachigianGunderson DettmerFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
- SARAH A. O'DOWDHeller EhrmanFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.37× · Went dark 1.29× · 95% wipeout 0.34×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark G. BordenWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jun 2004 | Named in a filing | 66 | 1.51 | 0.43 | 1.62 |
| Peter B. TarrHALE AND DORR | Jun 2004 | Named in a filing | 17 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 1.77 |
| Jay K. HachigianGunderson Dettmer | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 30 | 0.27 | 0.00 | 0.68 |
| SARAH A. O'DOWDHeller Ehrman | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 15 | 0.37 | 1.29 | 0.34 |