Symmetry Medical Inc. SMA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1292055Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Jan 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ice MillerFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in a filing · 112 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Barrett & McNagnyFirst linked May 2006 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Aug 2004 · Named in a filing · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Baker & DanielsFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLPFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 159 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Morris JamesFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ice Miller | Apr 2013 | Named in a filing | 112 | 1.19 | 0.21 | 0.93 |
| Barrett & McNagny | May 2006 | Named in a filing | 9 | 2.57 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Ropes & Gray | Aug 2004 | Named in a filing | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Baker & Daniels | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 129 | 1.11 | 0.45 | 1.22 |
| Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP | May 2004 | Text search only | 159 | 0.92 | 0.69 | 0.88 |
| Morris James | May 2004 | Text search only | 95 | 1.62 | 0.42 | 0.86 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stephen J. HackmanIce MillerFirst linked Jul 2013 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
- John M. JenningsNelson MullinsFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.97× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Paul T. ShultzFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in a filing · 136 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Gregory C. VogelspergerKirkland & EllisFirst linked Dec 2004 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.54×
- Dennis M. MyersKirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Patrick T. DuerrHonigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLPFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.97× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stephen J. HackmanIce Miller | Jul 2013 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.31 | 0.00 | 0.54 |
| John M. JenningsNelson Mullins | Mar 2005 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.97 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Paul T. Shultz | Mar 2005 | Named in a filing | 136 | 1.34 | 0.18 | 1.49 |
| Gregory C. VogelspergerKirkland & Ellis | Dec 2004 | Text search only | 7 | 2.64 | 0.00 | 1.54 |
| Dennis M. MyersKirkland & Ellis | May 2004 | Text search only | 69 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.64 |
| Patrick T. DuerrHonigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP | May 2004 | Text search only | 7 | 1.97 | 0.00 | 2.02 |