Gol Intelligent Airlines Inc. GOLLQ (last ticker on record)
CIK 1291733Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jan 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- 96%
- Jan 2013 to Jan 2016
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Dec 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Aug 2007 · Text search only · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- McCann FitzGeraldFirst linked Apr 2007 · Text search only · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Emmet Marvin & MartinFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Dec 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 439 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.76 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Maples and Calder | Aug 2007 | Text search only | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| McCann FitzGerald | Apr 2007 | Text search only | 27 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Emmet Marvin & Martin | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 199 | 0.81 | 0.16 | 0.85 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Manuel GarciadiazDavis PolkFirst linked May 2006 · Named in a filing · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Andrew B. JanszkyShearman & SterlingFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Andrew B. JánszkyShearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.01×
- Leslie N. SilvermanCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
- Francesca LavinCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.43×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manuel GarciadiazDavis Polk | May 2006 | Named in a filing | 40 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.82 |
| Andrew B. JanszkyShearman & Sterling | Mar 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 1.42 |
| Andrew B. JánszkyShearman & Sterling | Jun 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 2.01 |
| Leslie N. SilvermanCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jun 2004 | Named in a filing | 29 | 1.90 | 0.00 | 1.55 |
| Francesca LavinCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 7 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 2.43 |