Mueller Water Products, Inc. MWA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1291000Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Oct 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in a filing · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Jones DayFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 685 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Jun 2004 | Named in a filing | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
| Jones Day | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 685 | 1.25 | 0.55 | 1.11 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael KaplanDavis PolkFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in a filing · 112 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- John K. KnightDavis PolkFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Peter M. LabonskiLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.45×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael KaplanDavis Polk | Jun 2004 | Named in a filing | 112 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 0.86 |
| John K. KnightDavis Polk | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 6 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Peter M. LabonskiLatham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 20 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.45 |