Nalco Holdings LLC
CIK 1290090Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jun 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Barnes & ThornburgFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 167 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Davis PolkFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- McGuireWoods LLPFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 358 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Morris JamesFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Barnes & Thornburg | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 167 | 1.07 | 0.70 | 0.86 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | May 2004 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Davis Polk | May 2004 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Mayer Brown | May 2004 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| McGuireWoods LLP | May 2004 | Text search only | 358 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 1.11 |
| Morris James | May 2004 | Text search only | 95 | 1.62 | 0.42 | 0.86 |
| Shearman & Sterling | May 2004 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | May 2004 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | May 2004 | Text search only | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richard A. FenyesSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in a filing · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.32×
- Edward P. Tolley IIISimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.53×
- Daniel A. NeffWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 75 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- John EvangelakosSullivan & CromwellFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 2.37× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- OR FORMATIONSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Paul R. KingsleyJones WalkerFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Wilson S. NeelySimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.50× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard A. FenyesSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jun 2006 | Named in a filing | 39 | 0.36 | 0.00 | 0.32 |
| Edward P. Tolley IIISimpson Thacher & Bartlett | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 58 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.53 |
| Daniel A. NeffWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | May 2004 | Text search only | 75 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 0.82 |
| John EvangelakosSullivan & Cromwell | May 2004 | Text search only | 15 | 0.95 | 2.37 | 0.00 |
| OR FORMATIONSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | May 2004 | Text search only | 160 | 1.27 | 0.15 | 0.90 |
| Paul R. KingsleyJones Walker | May 2004 | Text search only | 7 | 1.49 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Wilson S. NeelySimpson Thacher & Bartlett | May 2004 | Text search only | 18 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 1.09 |