BCD Semiconductor Manufacturing Ltd
CIK 1289814Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in a filing · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Commerce & Finance Law OfficesFirst linked Jan 2008 · Named in a filing · 157 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Jan 2008 · Named in a filing · 1,145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jan 2008 · Named in a filing · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- White & CaseFirst linked Feb 2008 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jan 2008 · Text search only · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covington & Burling | Mar 2013 | Named in a filing | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.97 |
| Commerce & Finance Law Offices | Jan 2008 | Named in a filing | 157 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 0.98 |
| Maples and Calder | Jan 2008 | Named in a filing | 1,145 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.90 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jan 2008 | Named in a filing | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.41 |
| White & Case | Feb 2008 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Davis Polk | Jan 2008 | Text search only | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Eva H. WangFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.83× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.54×
- Richard A. KlineGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Carmen ChangWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jan 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Steven V. BernardWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jan 2008 · Named in a filing · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva H. WangFenwick & West LLP | Jan 2011 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.83 | 0.00 | 2.54 |
| Richard A. KlineGoodwin Procter | Jan 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 56 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Carmen ChangWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jan 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 1.16 |
| Steven V. BernardWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jan 2008 | Named in a filing | 40 | 0.96 | 0.00 | 1.08 |