Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC
CIK 1289785Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Schiff HardinFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Thompson CoburnFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | May 2004 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | May 2004 | Text search only | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Schiff Hardin | May 2004 | Text search only | 184 | 0.78 | 0.85 | 1.26 |
| Thompson Coburn | May 2004 | Text search only | 85 | 1.13 | 1.01 | 1.33 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joshua N. KorffKirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Jonathan A. SchaffzinCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
- Kenneth M. SchneiderPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
- Thomas A. LitzThompson CoburnFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joshua N. KorffKirkland & Ellis | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 107 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 1.43 |
| Jonathan A. SchaffzinCahill Gordon & Reindel | May 2004 | Text search only | 21 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 0.51 |
| Kenneth M. SchneiderPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | May 2004 | Text search only | 23 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 0.54 |
| Thomas A. LitzThompson Coburn | May 2004 | Text search only | 19 | 2.70 | 0.00 | 1.51 |