WII Components, Inc.
CIK 1289231Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jan 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Ettore A. SantucciFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Kaplan Strangis and KaplanFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Aug 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | May 2004 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Ettore A. Santucci | May 2004 | Text search only | 14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.63 |
| Goodwin Procter | May 2004 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Kaplan Strangis and Kaplan | May 2004 | Text search only | 24 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dennis M. MyersKirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- James C. MelvilleKaplan Strangis and KaplanFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- KEVIN M. DENNISGoodwin ProcterFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dennis M. MyersKirkland & Ellis | Aug 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 69 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.64 |
| James C. MelvilleKaplan Strangis and Kaplan | May 2004 | Text search only | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| KEVIN M. DENNISGoodwin Procter | May 2004 | Text search only | 7 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.00 |