River Rock Entertainment Authority
CIK 1288924Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Holland & KnightFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Brewer & Pritchard, P.C.First linked May 2004 · Text search only · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 1.64× · 95% wipeout 1.74×
- Faegre & BensonFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Hughes Hubbard & ReedFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 121 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holland & Knight | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 413 | 1.17 | 0.82 | 1.19 |
| Brewer & Pritchard, P.C. | May 2004 | Text search only | 46 | 1.57 | 1.64 | 1.74 |
| Faegre & Benson | May 2004 | Text search only | 160 | 0.90 | 0.59 | 1.08 |
| Greenberg Traurig | May 2004 | Text search only | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Hughes Hubbard & Reed | May 2004 | Text search only | 121 | 1.17 | 0.21 | 1.26 |
| Shearman & Sterling | May 2004 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Theodore H. LattyHughes Hubbard & ReedFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 4.14×
- Thomas C. PritchardBrewer & Pritchard, P.C.First linked May 2004 · Text search only · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.54× · Went dark 1.95× · 95% wipeout 1.99×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Theodore H. LattyHughes Hubbard & Reed | May 2004 | Text search only | 5 | 2.04 | 0.00 | 4.14 |
| Thomas C. PritchardBrewer & Pritchard, P.C. | May 2004 | Text search only | 37 | 1.54 | 1.95 | 1.99 |