NEW RIVER PHARMACEUTICALS INC NRPH (last ticker on record)
CIK 1288379Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Troutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Nov 2006 · Named in a filing · 335 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Nixon PeabodyFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 196 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 1,224 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Troutman Sanders LLP | Nov 2006 | Named in a filing | 335 | 1.14 | 0.61 | 1.22 |
| Hunton & Williams | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| Nixon Peabody | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 196 | 1.13 | 0.78 | 0.94 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 1,224 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.12 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David I. MeyersTroutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Jeffrey S. MarcusMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Jul 2004 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.25×
- David M. CarterHunton & WilliamsFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Donald J. MurrayCovington & BurlingFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Bruce A. MannMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David I. MeyersTroutman Sanders LLP | Dec 2004 | Named in a filing | 15 | 2.12 | 0.00 | 1.16 |
| Jeffrey S. MarcusMorrison & Foerster | Jul 2004 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.25 |
| David M. CarterHunton & Williams | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 22 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.24 |
| Donald J. MurrayCovington & Burling | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 27 | 1.20 | 0.59 | 1.12 |
| Bruce A. MannMorrison & Foerster | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 19 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 0.92 |