XERIUM TECHNOLOGIES INC XRM (last ticker on record)
CIK 1287151Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Jul 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Jul 2005 to Jun 2012
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2017 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Dentons US LLPFirst linked Dec 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Smith AndersonFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in a filing · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- White & CaseFirst linked Dec 2016 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Dec 2011 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Cummings & LockwoodFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.49× · 95% wipeout 2.03×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2017 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Dentons US LLP | Dec 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 102 | 0.91 | 0.40 | 1.48 |
| Smith Anderson | Nov 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 67 | 1.24 | 0.00 | 1.41 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Jun 2004 | Named in a filing | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Ropes & Gray | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| White & Case | Dec 2016 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Dec 2011 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Cummings & Lockwood | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 29 | 1.07 | 0.49 | 2.03 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- William P. O'NeillLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2017 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 4.85× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- Amy M. BattenSmith AndersonFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.22×
- Gerald F. RoachSmith AndersonFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.79×
- John B. AyerRopes & GrayFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.54× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Craig A. RoederBaker & McKenzieFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.72×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William P. O'NeillLatham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2017 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.42 | 4.85 | 0.63 |
| Amy M. BattenSmith Anderson | Nov 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 3.22 |
| Gerald F. RoachSmith Anderson | Nov 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 1.79 |
| John B. AyerRopes & Gray | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 8 | 2.54 | 0.00 | 1.29 |
| Craig A. RoederBaker & McKenzie | May 2005 | Text search only | 19 | 1.30 | 0.00 | 1.72 |